Nationwide (877) SEC-ATTY

Open/Close Menu Securities Arbitration – Investment Fraud Lawyers Securities Arbitration – Investment Fraud Lawyers
Skip to content
  • About The Firm
  • FINRA Securities Arbitration
    • The Legal Basis for Arbitration
    • The Securities Arbitration Process
    • Claim Arbitrability
    • Who Is A “Customer”
    • Member’s Business Activities
    • Arbitration Claim Eligibility
    • The Arbitrators
    • FINRA Discovery
    • Damages
  • Common Claims
    • Boiler-Room High Pressure Sales
    • Breach of Fiduciary Duty
    • Churning
    • Conflicts Of Interest
    • Cybertheft
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Excessive Markups And Fees
    • Excessive Trading
    • Failure to Conduct Due Diligence
    • Failure to Disclose Risk
    • Failure to Diversify
    • Failure to Execute
    • Failure to Supervise
    • Failure to Warn
    • False Statements and Omissions
    • Financial Suicide
    • Forgery – Document Alteration
    • Margin Account Fraud
    • Misappropriation of Customer Funds
    • Negligent Retirement Planning
    • Over-Concentration
    • Retail Bank Cross Selling
    • Retirement Planning Fraud
    • Selling Away
    • Stockbroker Negligence
    • Stockbroker Theft
    • Unauthorized Trading
    • Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
    • Wrongful Third Party Investment Referrals
  • Investment Products
    • Alternative Investments
    • Defective Bond Funds
    • Complex Derivative Products
    • FS Energy & Power Fund
    • GPB Automotive Portfolio, LP
    • GWG Class L Bonds
    • Hedge Funds
    • High Yield Bond Funds
    • Hospitality Investors Trust REIT
    • Inverse Leveraged ETF Funds
    • Municipal Bonds
    • Mutual Fund Fraud
    • Noble Royalty Access Funds
    • Non-Traded Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
    • NorthStar Healthcare Income Fund
    • Penny Stocks – Low Priced Securities
    • Ponzi Schemes
    • Private Placements
    • Reverse Convertible Securities
    • Shopoff Commercial Growth & Income Fund
    • Structured Products
    • Ultra-Short Bond Funds
    • Variable Annuities
    • Variable Interest Rate Structured Products
  • Investor Resources
  • News
  • Contact Us

Sheriff Cracks Down On Robinhood For Stealing From The Poor and Unsophisticated

  
Guiliano Law Group PC July 31, 2021
Robinhood image

Robinhood Financial LLC a securities broker dealer headquartered in Menlo Park California has been censured and fined $57,000,000.00 by Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) based in part on findings that Robinhood Financial provided customers with misleading and false information about their accounts, authorized margin use in the accounts of customers against their wishes, and failed to supervise its options trading business resulting in harm to customers. Letter of Acceptance Waiver and Consent No. 2020066971201 (June 30, 2021).

According to the AWC, Robinhood was negligent in misrepresenting that customers’ accounts were not margin-enabled. Robinhood Instant customers were told since December of 2017 that they could trade by using unsettled funds up to the amount set in their Robinhood Instant accounts. But on Robinhood’s website, customers were only able to use margin if they had a Robinhood Gold account. Robinhood Gold customers were falsely informed that they would be able to disable their margin use through their app. Robinhood Gold customers who disabled margin use were supposed to be disallowed from trading on margin. FINRA relayed that those restrictions did not stop Robinhood from causing margin use to occur in customers’ Robinhood Instant and Robinhood Gold accounts.

818,000 Robinhood Instant and Robinhood Gold customers were improperly authorized to make options trades which included options spreads. The AWC stated that Robinhood failed to let customers know that even with margin being disabled, their accounts could still handle trades that could involve hundreds of thousands of dollars in margin.

Among the confused customers was a young investor who committed suicide in June 2020. The deceased investor left a note that conveyed in part that he did not understand how margin could have been utilized to buy securities because he did not think that he turned margin on in his account. Another customer received a $271,986.64 margin call after an options assignment. In a complaint to the firm, the customer stated that the margin call was not accurate since the customer’s margin trading was disabled on their account. The customer stressed that they only wanted their losses to be limited by what they personally invested.

FINRA determined that Robinhood made negligent omissions and misrepresentations relating to these Robinhood Instant and Robinhood Gold accounts in violation of FINRA Rules 2010 and 2210.

The regulator also noted that customers received false information regarding their buying power and their cash balances. The AWC stated that from December of 2019 to June of 2020, 135,000 customers received inaccurate cash balances. Those with negative cash balances saw double the amount in the negative. As an example, FINRA noted that the deceased customer had a cash balance of negative $730,165.72 the day before the customer died. In reality the customer’s cash balance was negative $365,530.60.

Between September of 2016 and September of 2020, 4,200,000 customers had received inaccurate information about negative buying power. The securities broker dealer violated FINRA Rules 2010 and 2210 because of misrepresenting the cash balances and buying power in customer accounts.

According to the AWC, between January of 2018 and March of 2021, omissions and misrepresentations were also made about the risks pertaining to options spread transactions and how Robinhood would handle customers’ positions.

FINRA noted that there was misleading and false information provided by Robinhood as it pertained to the risks of debit spreads. FINRA noted that Robinhood did not take into account how customers would be at risk in two key situations. The first instance involved an assignment of the short option held to expiration, and where the long option would expire worthless. The second instance involved the short option not being assigned, and where either the customer or Robinhood would exercise the long option. Customers in those instances were due to suffer losses that exceeded the amounts that they paid in premiums to enter into spreads.

The regulator mentioned that there were also misrepresentations made to customers by Robinhood as it pertained to customers not needing to do anything to mitigate risks before their options expired. Customers did not know that their short positions could still be assigned rather than expire worthless. If those short positions could still be assigned, this could result in losses. The regulator also noted that some customers whose options were set to expire were falsely told by Robinhood that they had adequate collateral for their assignments. Customers who depended on Robinhood’s statements suffered large losses according to FINRA.

The AWC also stated that negligent misrepresentations were made by Robinhood regarding under which conditions the company would exercise long legs of customers’ options spread positions. Many customers’ long options were exercised which resulted in losses.

Robinhood violated FINRA Rules 2010, 2210 and 2220 for misrepresenting risks of options spreads.

According to the AWC, Robinhood also issued incorrect margin calls to customers between October of 2016 and September of 2019. Over 100,000 customers were effected. The regulator noted that $1,650,000.00 in losses were caused by false margin calls and margin call warnings. As an example, on August 10, 2018, 84,100 customers were warned that their accounts were in danger of there being a margin call and that customers had to sell stock or deposit cash to ensure that the value of their portfolio exceeded their margin maintenance. Incorrect margin call warnings resulted in securities being sold in 19,000 accounts on August 13, 2018. FINRA indicated that it was only after customers had complained that Robinhood discovered the problem. The securities broker dealer violated FINRA Rules 2010 and 2210.

 

CategoryFailure To Supervise, Investment and Regulatory News, Margin Account Fraud
TagsRobinhood Financial LLC
  •  Share
  •  
  •  Tweet
  •  

 

Important Disclaimer 
The information contained herein has been obtained from reliable sources however may not be accurate and is not guaranteed by us. Readers are encouraged to undertake their own independent investigation and evaluation of the relevant facts. All claims and allegations are subject to adjudication, decisions may be subject to appeal, and no inference is intended, nor should any inference be made from any information contained herein from any source.
Questions or comments regarding the source or accuracy of information, including any subsequent developments, should be directed to:
contact@securitiesarbitrations.com
This posting and the information on our website is for general information purposes only. This content should be not considered legal advice, and any responses, comments, e-mails, other communications do not form any attorney client relationship. Attorney Advertisement.
See Important Disclaimer.

Related Stories

investor justice 
September 16, 2023

SunTrust Investment Services Named In FINRA Arbitration Claim

Arthur Gilbert Faren of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a stockbroker registered with SunTrust Investment Services Inc., was…

Guiliano Law Group PC
Posted in: Failure to Execute, FINRA Securities Arbitration, Investment and Regulatory News, Unauthorized Trading, Unsuitable Investment Recommendations
Tags: Arthur Gilbert Faren, SunTrust Investment Services Inc
Ameriprise Logo 
September 16, 2023

Investors Settle FINRA Arbitration Claim Involving Ameriprise Financial Stockbroker

Brent William Makarczyk, of Kingston, Pennsylvania, a stockbroker registered with Ameriprise Financial Services LLC, was…

Guiliano Law Group PC
Posted in: FINRA Securities Arbitration, Investment and Regulatory News, Real Estate Investment Trusts
Tags: Ameriprise Financial Services Inc., Brent William Makarczyk
FINRA brokercheck 
September 16, 2023

Grove Point Investments Stockbroker Discharged For Customer Complaints

Clayton Kwok Shum, of Burlingame, California, a stockbroker registered with Grove Point Investments LLC, has…

Guiliano Law Group PC
Posted in: Investment and Regulatory News
Tags: Clayton Kwok Shum, Grove Point Investments LLC
Morgan Stanley 
September 16, 2023

Investors File FINRA Arbitration Claim Against Morgan Stanley Over Corporate Bonds

Daniel Joe Baldwin of Walnut Creek, California, a stockbroker registered with Morgan Stanley, is the…

Guiliano Law Group PC
Posted in: Bond Fraud, FINRA Securities Arbitration, Investment and Regulatory News
Tags: Daniel Joe Baldwin, Morgan Stanley
man with head in hands 
September 16, 2023

Landolt Securities Settles FINRA Arbitration Claim Involving GWG Bonds

Donald Trendley McKiernan of Antioch, Illinois, a stockbroker registered with Landolt Securities Inc., was the subject…

Guiliano Law Group PC
Posted in: Failure To Supervise, FINRA Securities Arbitration, GWG Holdings Class L Bonds, Investment and Regulatory News
Tags: Donald Trendley McKiernan, Landolt Securities
man with money in pocket 
September 16, 2023

Florida Regulator Sanctions Massachusetts Stockbroker For Being Unregistered

Gary James Najarian, of West Newton, Massachusetts, a stockbroker registered with Perpetual Financial, has been…

Guiliano Law Group PC
Posted in: Investment and Regulatory News
The key logo of the Swiss UBS Financial Services 
September 16, 2023

Investors File FINRA Arbitration Claim Against UBS Financial Services

Jack Ryan Riley, of Warren, New Jersey, a stockbroker registered with UBS Financial Services Inc.,…

Guiliano Law Group PC
Posted in: FINRA Securities Arbitration, Investment and Regulatory News
Tags: Jack Ryan Riley, UBS Financial Services Inc.
stockbroker misconduct 
September 16, 2023

Investors Continue To File FINRA Arbitration Claims Against Wealthforge Securities

James Leroy Raper Jr., of Richmond, Virginia, a stockbroker and the Chief Compliance Officer of…

Guiliano Law Group PC
Posted in: Alternative Investments, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Failure to Conduct Due Diligence, Failure To Supervise, FINRA Securities Arbitration, Investment and Regulatory News
Tags: James Leroy Raper Jr., Wealthforge Securities LLC

– ↑ BACK TO TOP –

Call Us Toll Free (Nationwide):

(877) SEC-ATTY

REQUEST A CONFIDENTIAL CONSULTATION  →

We accept representation on a contingent fee basis, meaning there is no cost to you unless we make a recovery for you. There is never any charge for a consultation or a confidential evaluation of your claim. For more information, See Important Disclaimer.
Important Disclaimer

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

1700 Market Street, Suite 1005
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

Direct: (215) 413-8223
E-mail: contact@securitiesarbitrations.com

Get directions on the map →

Aventura, Florida

2750 NE 185th Street, Suite 302
Aventura, Florida 33180

Direct: (786) 490-2413
E-mail: contact@securitiesarbitrations.com

Get directions on the map →

Los Angeles, California

1260 South Soto Street, Suite 7
Los Angeles, California 90023

Direct: (213) 255-3475
E-mail: contact@securitiesarbitrations.com

Get directions on the map →

© 2023 Guiliano Law Group, P.C.

SITE MAP

                

