Frederick Bremer, of Casselberry, Florida, a former stockbroker with G.A. Repple & Company, has been subject to a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim on August 17, 2015, in which the customer requested $60,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that Bremer effected unsuitable investment transactions regarding Church Capital Funding and other church bonds which California Baptist Foundation issued and ultimately defaulted on.
FINRA Public Disclosure also reveals that on March 24, 2010, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Bremer’s conduct was settled for $15,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that Bremer effected investment transactions in church bonds which were unsuitable for the customer, causing the customer to suffer investment losses.
Additionally, on February 10, 2014, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Bremer’s actions was resolved for $6,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that Bremer placed the customer into an illiquid bond mutual fund that was unsuitable for the customer.
Mark S. Immel, of Inverness, Florida, a stockbroker formerly registered with G.A. Repple & Company, has been subject to a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim from December 19, 2014, which was settled for $25,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that Immel negligently handled the customer’s investment accounts, and breached his fiduciary and contractual obligations to the customer.
FINRA Public Disclosure reveals that Immel has been subject to nineteen additional events concerning allegations of misconduct, eighteen of which involve customer arbitrations. Particularly, on March 2, 2000, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Immel’s conduct was settled for $16,763.70 in damages based upon allegations that Immel failed to disclose the terms associated with a certificate of deposit investment.
Additionally, on March 18, 2008, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Immel’s actions was resolved for $125,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that Immel made misrepresentations to the customer concerning investments in corporate bonds and mutual funds, and effected unsuitable investment transactions in the customer’s account. On June 16, 2009, another customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Immel’s conduct was settled for $16,000.00 in damages based upon allegations of misrepresentation and unsuitability regarding mutual funds purchases.
Further, on March 15, 2010, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Immel’s actions was settled for $60,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that Immel made misrepresentations to the customer concerning Morgan Keegan Funds, and effected unsuitable investments concerning such.
Subsequently, on August 26, 2010, a customer initiated investment related arbitration action involving Immel’s conduct was resolved for $16,250.00 in damages based upon allegations that Immel effected unsuitable transactions in the customer’s account concerning preferred stock issued by Fannie Mae, and made misrepresentations to the customer concerning such investments.
On October 14, 2010, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Immell’s conduct was settled for $25,425.00 in damages based upon allegations against Immel including unsuitability. Subsequently, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Immel’s actions was settled for $25,000.00 on April 8, 2011, based upon allegations that Immel effected unsuitable mutual funds purchases in the customer’s account.
Further, on May 24, 2013, an additional customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Immel’s conduct was settled for $23,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that Immel violated Florida’s Securities and Investor Protection Act, negligently handled the customer’s account, and breached his contractual and fiduciary duties to the customer. On September 4, 2013, another customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Immel’s actions was resolved for $40,000.00 in damages based upon allegations of misrepresentation, unsuitability, breach of fiduciary duty, and illiquidity.
Guiliano Law Group
Our practice is limited to the representation of investors. We accept representation on a contingent fee basis, meaning there is no cost to you unless we make a recovery for you. There is never any charge for a consultation or an evaluation of your claim. For more information, contact us at (877) SEC-ATTY.
