Robert Bruce Cline of Rochester Michigan a stockbroker formerly employed by Oppenheimer Co. Inc. is the subject of a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim in which the customer requested more than $5,000.00 in damages based upon allegations that between 2007 and 2017: (1) fiduciary obligations to the customer were breached (2) the customer’s penny stock transactions were not supervised (3) contractual terms were breached (4) stock transactions were effected in the customer’s account that were not suitable and (5) the customer was defrauded. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Arbitration No. 17-03146 (Nov. 21, 2017).

FINRA Public Disclosure confirms that Cline is referenced in six more customer initiated investment related disputes pertaining to accusations of his violative conduct during the period that he was associated with Lehman Brothers, Inc., Manley, Bennet, McDonald & Co., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. Particularly, Cline was named in a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim where the customer was awarded $19,688.00 in damages based upon Cline being found liable on the customer’s claims of breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, negligence and securities law violations relating to the customer’s brokerage accounts and individual retirement accounts. National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) Arbitration No. 99-02160 (Jan. 9, 2002).

On April 24, 2003, another customer initiated investment related complaint concerning Cline’s activities was resolved for $94,034.81 in damages supported by allegations that it was inappropriate for the customer’s life insurance policy to have been exchanged into annuity products. Subsequently, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Cline’s conduct was settled for $40,000.00 in damages founded on accusations that trades were executed in the customer’s account on an excessive basis; transactions were effected in the customer’s account that were not suitable for the customer; and misrepresentations had been made to the customer concerning equity trades. NASD Arbitration No. 02-03264 (Dec. 2, 2004).

The information contained herein has been from reliable sources however may not be accurate and is not guaranteed by us. Readers are encouraged to undertake their own independent and evaluation of the relevant facts. All claims and allegations are subject to adjudication, decisions may be subject to appeal, and no inference is intended, nor should any inference be made from any information contained herein from any source.

This posting and the information on our website is for general information purposes only. This content should be not considered legal advice, and any responses, comments, e-mails, other communications do not form any attorney client relationship. Attorney Advertisement. See Important Disclaimer

Guiliano Law Group

Our practice is limited to the representation of investors. Over the last three decades, we have recovered more than a hundred million dollars for more than 1,000 injured investors from all over the United States and several foreign countries. We accept representation purely on a contingent fee basis, meaning there is no cost to you unless we make a recovery for you. There is never any charge for a confidential consultation or an evaluation of your claim. For more information, contact us at (877) SEC-ATTY.

For more information concerning common claims against stockbrokers and investment professionals, please visit us at securitiesarbitrations.com

To learn more about FINRA Securities Arbitration, and the legal process, please visit us at securitiesarbitrations.com