Manuel David Lozano of Pasadena California a stockbroker currently employed by Stifel Nicolaus Company Inc. is the subject of a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim where the customer requested $250,000.00 in damages based upon allegations of (1) misrepresentation (2) suitability and (3) elder abuse pertaining to the customer’s corporate debt investments. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Arbitration No. 18-01108 (Mar. 26, 2018).

FINRA Public Disclosure reveals that Lozano has been identified in eight more customer initiated investment related disputes containing accusations of Lozano’s wrongdoing while employed by A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. and Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. Specifically, a customer initiated investment related arbitration claim pertaining to Lozano’s conduct was resolved for $48,500.00 in damages based upon allegations that Lozano, inter alia: violated the California Civil Code; churned the customer’s investment portfolio; effected unauthorized transactions in the customer’s account; placed unsuitable over-the-counter equities transactions; made misrepresentations and omissions to the customer; negligently transacted in the customer’s account; and breached his fiduciary obligations to the customer. FINRA Arbitration No. 02-062164 (March 3, 2003).

Subsequently, a customer brought an investment related arbitration claim concerning Lozano’s conduct in which the customer sought $140,000.00 in damages founded on accusations including the violation of FINRA rules, breach of fiduciary duty, and suitability pertaining to the customer’s corporate debt holdings. FINRA Arbitration No. 17-01723 (June 28, 2017). Another customer initiated investment related arbitration claim involving Lozano’s activities was settled for $50,000.00 in damages supported by allegations including breach of contract, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, omissions of fact, misrepresentation, and suitability relating to stock transactions executed in the customer’s account. FINRA Arbitration No. 10-04475 (July 1, 2011). Then, on August 21, 2017, a customer filed an investment related complaint concerning Lozano’s activities where the customer alleged that corporate bond transactions were misrepresented by Lozano.

The information contained herein has been obtained from reliable sources however may not be accurate and is not guaranteed by us. Readers are encouraged to undertake their own independent investigation and evaluation of the relevant facts. All claims and allegations are subject to adjudication, decisions may be subject to appeal, and no inference is intended, nor should any inference be made from any information contained herein from any source.

This posting and the information on our website is for general information purposes only. This content should be not considered legal advice, and any responses, comments, e-mails, other communications do not form any attorney client relationship. Attorney Advertisement. See Important Disclaimer

Guiliano Law Group

Our practice is limited to the representation of investors. We accept representation on a contingent fee basis, meaning there is no cost to you unless we make a recovery for you. There is never any charge for a consultation or an evaluation of your claim. For more information, contact us at (877) SEC-ATTY.

For more information concerning common claims against stockbrokers and investment professionals, please visit us at securitiesarbitrations.com

To learn more about FINRA Securities Arbitration, and the legal process, please visit us at securitiesarbitrations.com

Tags: ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Name (required)

Email (will not be published) (required)

Website